[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.Hill, A., "Dating Second Zechariah.A Linguistic Reexamination," HAR 6 (1982) 105-34.Hurvitz, A., "The Chronological Significance of 'Aramaisms' in Biblical Hebrew," IEJ 18 (1968) 234-40.Hurvitz, A., Ben Lashon le-Lashon (Biblical Hebrew in Transition: A Study in Post-Exilic and its Implications for the Datingof the Psalms) (Jerusalem: Mosad Bialik, 1972).Hurvitz, A., "Linguistic Criteria for Dating Problematic Biblical Texts," Hebrew Abstracts 14 (1973) 74-79.Hurvitz, A., "The Date of the Prose-Tale of Job Linguistically Considered," HTR 67 (1974) 17-34.Hurvitz, A., "The Evidence of Language in Dating the Priestly Code - A Linguistic Study in Technical Idioms andTerminology," RB 81 (1974) 24-56.Hurvitz, A., A Linguistic Study of the Relationship Between the Priestly Source and the Book of Ezekiel: A New Approach toan Old Problem (CahRB 20; Paris: Gabalda, 1982).Hurvitz, A., Review of D.C.Fredericks, Qoheleth's Language: Re-evaluating its Nature and Date, Hebrew Studies 31 (1990)144-54.Hurvitz, A., "Continuity and Innovation in Biblical Hebrew - the Case of 'Semantic Change' in Post-Exilic Writings," Studiesin Ancient Hebrew Semantics (ed.T.Muraoka; Abr-Nahrain Supplement 4; Louvain: Peeters, 1995) 1-10.Hurvitz, A., "The Historical Quest for 'Ancient Israel' and the Linguistic Evidence of the Hebrew Bible: SomeMethodological Observations," VT 47 (1997) 301-15 (review article of P.R.Davies, In Search of 'Ancient Israel'[JSOTSup 148; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1992]).Hurvitz, A., "The Relevance of Biblical Hebrew Linguistics for the Historical Study of Ancient Israel," Proceedings of theTwelfth World Congress of Jewish Studies.Division A: The Bible and Its World (Jerusalem: World Union of JewishStudies, 1999) 21*-33*.Hurvitz, A., "Can Biblical Texts be Dated Linguistically? Chronological Perspectives in the Historical Study of BiblicalHebrew," Congress Volume: Oslo 1998 (VTSup 80; Leiden: Brill, 2000) 143-60.Hurvitz, A., "Once Again: The Linguistic Profile of the Priestly Material in the Pentateuch and its Historical Agenda.AResponse to J.Blenkinsopp," ZAW 112 (2000) 180.Hurvitz, A.,  [ro sh-davar] and [sôp dabar]: Reflexes of Two Scribal Terms Imported into Biblical Hebrew from theImperial Aramaic Formulary, Hamlet on a Hill: Semitic and Greek Studies Presented to Professor T.Muraoka onthe Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday (ed.M.F.J.Baasten and W.Th.van Peursen; OLA 118; Leuven: Peeters,2003) 281-86.Kropat, A., Die Syntax des Autors der Chronik vergleichen mit der seiner Quellen (BZAW 16; Giessen: Töpelmann, 1909).Levine, B.A.,  Research in the Priestly Source: The Linguistic Factor, EI 16 (1982) 124-31 (Heb.).Levine, B.A.,  Late Language in the Priestly Source: Some Literary and Historical Observations, Proceedings of the EighthWorld Congress of Jewish Studies, Panel Sessions: Bible Studies and Hebrew Language (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1983)69-82.Muraoka, T., "The Nominal Clause in Late Biblical Hebrew and Mishnaic Hebrew," Language Studies 4 (1990) 219-52(Heb.).Naveh, J., and J.C.Greenfield, "Hebrew and Aramaic in the Persian Period," The Cambridge History of Judaism.Volume 1(Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1984) 115-29.Noguchi, T.,  A Study of the Verbs in Joel 2:4-9: The Author s Style or Aramaic Influence? Orient 33 (1998) 103-14.http://oi.uchicago.edu/OI/DEPT/RA/bibs/BH-Ugaritic.html 421.BASIC TEXTS AND TOOLSOlafsson, S., "Late Biblical Hebrew - Fact or Fiction?" Intertestamental Essays in Honour of Józef Tadeusz Milik (ed.Z.J.Kapera; Krakow: The Enigma Press, 1992) 135-47.Patton, C., "Psalm 132: A Methodological Inquiry," CBQ 57 (1995) 643-54, esp.644-48.Polak, F.H., "Development and Periodization of Biblical Prose Narrative (First Part)," Bet Mikra 43/1 (1998) 30-52 (inHebrew, with English summary on pp.II-III).Polak, F.H., "Development and Periodization of Biblical Prose Narrative (Second Part)," Bet Mikra 43/1 (1998) 142-160 (inHebrew, with English summary on pp.198-99).Polak, F.H., "The Oral and the Written: Biblical Syntax, Stylistics and the Development of Prose Narrative," JANES 26(1998) 59-105.Polak, F.H.,  The Style of the Dialogue in Biblical Prose Narrative, JANES 28 (2001) 53-95.Polzin, R., Late Biblical Hebrew: Toward a Historical Typology of Biblical Hebrew Prose (Missoula, MT: Scholars, 1976).Polzin, R., "Notes on the Dating of the Non-massoretic Psalms of 11QPsaa," HTR 60 (1967) 468-76.Qimron, E., "The Dating of the Book of Jonah," Beth Mikra 81 (1980) 181-2 (Heb.).Rendsburg, G.A., "Late Biblical Hebrew and the Date of 'P'," JANES 12 (1980) 65-80.Rendsburg, G.A.,  Once More the Dual: With Replies to J.Blau and J.Blenkinsopp, Ancient Near Eastern Studies 38(2001) 28-41.Rendsburg, G.A., "Some False Leads in the Identification of Late Biblical Hebrew Texts: The Cases of Genesis 24 and 1Samuel 2:27-36," JBL 121 (2002) 23-46.Rooker, M.F., "The Diachronic Study of Biblical Hebrew," JNWSL 14 (1988) 199-214.Rooker, M.F., Biblical Hebrew in Transition: The Language of the Book of Ezekiel (JSOTSup 90; Sheffield: SheffieldAcademic Press, 1990).Rooker, M.F., "Ezekiel and the Typology of Biblical Hebrew," HAR 12 (1990) 133-55.Rooker, M.F., "Diachronic Analysis and the Features of Late Biblical Hebrew," Bulletin for Biblical Research 4 (1994) 135-44.Schaper, J., "Hebrew and Its Study in the Persian Period," Hebrew Study From Ezra to Ben-Yehuda (ed.W.Horbury;Edinburgh: T.& T.Clark, 1999) 15-26.Schattner-Reiser, U., "L'hébreu post-exilique," La Palestine à l'epoque perse (ed.E.M.Laperrousaz and A.Lemaire; Paris:Cerf, 1994) 189-224.von Soden, W.,  Gab es bereits im vorexilischen Hebräisch Aramaismen in der Bildung und der Verwendung vonVerbalformen? ZAH 4 (1991) 32-45.von Soden, W., "Zur Verwendung des Narrativs waj-jiqtol im nachexilischen Hebräisch," ZAH 7/2 (1994) 196-202.Talshir, D., "The Autonomic Status of Late Biblical Hebrew," Language Studies II-III (ed.M.Bar-Asher; Jerusalem: HebrewUniversity, 1987) 161-72 (Heb.).Tur-Sinai, N.H [ Pobierz caÅ‚ość w formacie PDF ]